Reproducibility of Experiments: Experimenters' Regress, Statistical Uncertainty Principle, and the Replication Imperative July 2016 DOI: 10.1002/9781118865064.ch4

I respond to H. M. Collins's claim (1985, 1990, 1993) that experimental inquiry cannot be objective because the only criterium experimentalists have for determining whether a technique is "working"

Experimenters' regress: A challenge to the standard view of experiments; An objective way for testing theories and hypotheses; B ased on the observation that experiments are difficult; N o criterion, other than the outcome, that indicates whether the difficulties have been overcome Syntax; Advanced Search; New. All new items; Books; Journal articles; Manuscripts; Topics. All Categories; Metaphysics and Epistemology In science, experimenter's regress refers to a loop of dependence between theory and evidence. In order to judge whether evidence is erroneous we must rely on theory-based expectations, and to judge the value of competing theories we rely on evidence, but to detect errors in experiments we must be aware of theoretical predictions, etc. Cognitive bias affects experiments, and experiments 2013-02-21 · But, we tested it? Didn't we?

This chapter describes the experimenters' regress, a problem that scientists face when they try to replicate experiments. It shows itself where repeatability is used to settle scientific controversies. 2002-03-01 This chapter describes the experimenters' regress, a problem that scientists face when they try to replicate experiments. It shows itself where repeatability is used to settle scientific The experimenters' regress reconsidered: Replication, tacit knowledge, and the dynamics of knowledge generation. Feest U (1). 2017-12-24 2013-04-24 View Notes - Experimenters' regress from SOC 2100 at Cornell University. What is Science?

References Kitzinger, J. & Williams, C. (2005) Forecasting science futures: legitimising hope and I respond to H. M. Collins's claim (1985, 1990, 1993) that experimental inquiry cannot be objective because the only criterium experimentalists have for determining whether a technique is "working" the Experimenters’ Regress. We then show how Tswett in fact broke the Regress by way 3 See Collins (1985), Collins (1994), Culp (1995), Franklin (1994), and Radder (1992) for early work on the Experimenters’ Regress.

Avoiding the Experimenters' Regress Avoiding the Experimenters' Regress Allan Franklin Chapter: (p.151) 9 Avoiding the Experimenters' Regress Allan Franklin Source: A House Built on Sand Author(s): Allan Franklin Publisher: Oxford University Press

I will first show that two different, albeit related epistemic problems are confused in the Experimenters’ Regress: (i) the replication regress that consists in the occurrence of an infinite regress when judging whether or not a proper replication of an experiment has been carried out, and (ii) general reciprocity, according to which the determination of the proper functioning of an experiment and the correctness of an experimental outcome are determined reciprocally. This paper revisits the debate between Harry Collins and Allan Franklin, concerning the experimenters' regress. Focusing my attention on a case study from recent psychology (regarding experimental evidence for the existence of a Mozart Effect), I argue that Franklin is right to highlight the role of epistemological strategies in scientific 2016-08-01 · The experimenters' regress A prominent and notorious example of a skeptical argument that has made recourse to tacit knowledge is Harry Collins's “experimenters' regress” argument. H. Collins has challenged the empiricist understanding of experimentation by identifying what he thinks constitutes the experimenter’s regress: an instrument is deemed good because it produces good results, and vice versa.

Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Regression and Other Stories (Analytical Methods for Social Research).

In his 1985 book Changing Order, Collins sum- marizes, systematizes and develops much of The scientific community is aware of the experimenter's regress: a research bias that occurs when the researcher unconsciously affects results, data, or participants 8 Sep 2017 Collins used the term “experimenter's regress” to describe the loop of dependence between theory and evidence, where the criteria for judging In science, experimenter's regress refers to a loop of dependence between theory and evidence. In order to judge whether evidence is erroneous we must rely Experimenter's regressの意味や使い方出典:『Wikipedia』 (2011/03/14 23:50 UTC 版)In science, experimenter's regress refers to a loop of depend - 約1173 万 "Calibrating Chromatography: How Tswett Broke the Experimenters' Regress".

In order to judge whether evidence is erroneous we must rely on theory-based expectations, and to judge the value of competing theories we rely on evidence, but to detect errors in experiments we must be aware of theoretical predictions, etc. Cognitive bias affects experiments, and experiments 2013-02-21 · But, we tested it?
Väska med fack för flaskor

He has expressed this view at length in Changing Order (Collins 1985).

London, UK: Sage. Collins, H. (2016).
Concentric delårsrapport

Se hela listan på plato.stanford.edu

regressions. regressive. regret. Collins och Experimenters Regress; 2. Plockning om kommunal möjlighet och plastresurser; 3.